Usability of Mobile Health Apps for Postoperative Care: Systematic Review

LATEST ARTICLES
SEARCH INDEX
SUGGEST ARTICLE
THE OSI COLLECTIONS
ABOUT THE OSI

OSI STATISTICS

Total abstracts indexed:
538
Audio abstracts:
101
Open access articles:
478
Pending review:
124
Annotations added:
2
Countries represented:
91
No. of contributors:
10
Bookmarks made:
12
Specialities covered:
19

Usability of Mobile Health Apps for Postoperative Care: Systematic Review


JournalJMIR Perioperative Medicine
Publication date – Jul – 2020
Authors – Ben Patel BA BMBCh, Arron Thind BA BMBCh
Keywordsmobile health app, mobile phone, Postoperative care, postoperative monitoring, smartphone, telemedicine
Open access – Yes
SpecialityOther
World region Global

Language – English
Submitted to the One Surgery Index on August 3, 2020 at 1:36 am
Abstract:

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) apps are increasingly used postoperatively to monitor, educate, and rehabilitate. The usability of mHealth apps is critical to their implementation.

Objective: This systematic review evaluates the (1) methodology of usability analyses, (2) domains of usability being assessed, and (3) results of usability analyses.

Methods: The A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews checklist was consulted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline was adhered to. Screening was undertaken by 2 independent reviewers. All included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Domains of usability were compared with the gold-standard mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ).

Results: A total of 33 of 720 identified studies were included for data extraction. Of the 5 included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), usability was never the primary end point. Methodology of usability analyses included interview (10/33), self-created questionnaire (18/33), and validated questionnaire (9/33). Of the 3 domains of usability proposed in the MAUQ, satisfaction was assessed in 28 of the 33 studies, system information arrangement was assessed in 11 of the 33 studies, and usefulness was assessed in 18 of the 33 studies. Usability of mHealth apps was above industry average, with median System Usability Scale scores ranging from 76 to 95 out of 100.

Conclusions: Current analyses of mHealth app usability are substandard. RCTs are rare, and validated questionnaires are infrequently consulted. Of the 3 domains of usability, only satisfaction is regularly assessed. There is significant bias throughout the literature, particularly with regards to conflicts of interest. Future studies should adhere to the MAUQ to assess usability and improve the utility of mHealth apps.

OSI Number – 20622

Public annotations on this article:
No public annotations yet