Surgical and Trauma Capacity Assessment in Rural Haryana, India

LATEST ARTICLES
SEARCH INDEX
SUGGEST ARTICLE
THE OSI COLLECTIONS
AUDIOGRAM SERIES
ABOUT THE OSI
2020 SUMMARY

OSI STATISTICS

Open access articles:
840
Annotations added:
3
Countries represented:
106
No. of contributors:
12
Bookmarks made:
21

Surgical and Trauma Capacity Assessment in Rural Haryana, India


JournalAnnals of Global Health
Article typeJournal research article – Clinical research
Publication date – Feb – 2021
Authors – Manisha B. Bhatia , Srivarshini C. Mohan, Kevin J. Blair, Marissa A. Boeck, Ashish Bhalla, Sristi Sharma, Irene Helenowski, Leah C. Tatebe, Benedict C. Nwomeh, Mamta Swaroop
Keywordscapacities, Haryana, trauma
Open access – Yes
SpecialityHealth policy, Trauma surgery
World region Southern Asia
Country: India
Language – English
Submitted to the One Surgery Index on February 26, 2021 at 12:00 am
Abstract:

Abstract
Background: Trauma is a major global health problem and majority of the deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), at even higher rates in the rural areas. The three-delay model assesses three different delays in accessing healthcare and can be applied to improve surgical and trauma healthcare delivery. Prior to implementing change, the capacities of the rural India healthcare system need to be identified.

Objective: The object of this study was to estimate surgical and trauma care capacities of government health facilities in rural Nanakpur, Haryana, India using the Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment and Supplies (PIPES) and International Assessment of Capacity for Trauma (INTACT) tools.

Methods: The PIPES and INTACT tools were administered at eight government health facilities serving the population of Nanakpur in June 2015. Data analysis was performed per tool subsection, and an overall score was calculated. Higher PIPES or INTACT indices correspond to greater surgical or trauma care capacity, respectively.

Findings: Surgical and trauma care capacities increased with higher levels of care. The median PIPES score was significantly higher for tertiary facilities than primary and secondary facilities [13.8 (IQR 9.5, 18.2) vs. 4.7 (IQR 3.9, 6.2), p = 0.03]. The lower-level facilities were mainly lacking in personnel and procedures.

Conclusions: Surgical and trauma care capacities at healthcare facilities in Haryana, India demonstrate a shortage of surgical resources at lower-level centers. Specifically, the Primary Health Centers were not operating at full capacity. These results can inform resource allocation, including increasing education, across different facility levels in rural India.

OSI Number – 20950

Public annotations on this article:
No public annotations yet