THE OSI COLLECTIONS
ABOUT THE OSI
Open access articles:
No. of contributors:
Hernioplasty Using Low-Cost Mesh Compared to Surgical Mesh in Low- And Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Protocol
Journal – JBI Evidence Synthesis
Publication date – Jan – 2020
Authors – Ashish Immanuel Vaska, Zachary Munn , Sonal Nagra , Timothy Hugh Barker
Keywords – Hernia repair, inguinal hernia, Low-and middle-income countries, low-cost mesh, surgical mesh
Open access – Yes
Speciality – General surgery
World region Global
Language – English
Submitted to the One Surgery Index on May 7, 2020 at 8:25 am
Objective: This review aims to assess the differences in surgical outcomes between hernioplasty using low-cost mesh and surgical mesh in adults undergoing elective hernioplasty in low- and middle-income countries.
Introduction: The use of untreated mosquito netting in inguinal hernioplasty in low- and middle-income countries has been well described in the literature, with two recent limited systematic reviews finding equivalent postoperative surgical outcomes. This comprehensive review, across a wider set of databases and gray literature, will assess a broader set of outcomes including patient and surgeon preference and sterility, report more granular complication outcomes, and include other low-cost mesh alternatives such as resterilized surgical mesh and indigenous products, alongside mosquito net mesh.
Inclusion criteria: Adult patients undergoing elective inguinal hernioplasty with mesh in low- and middle-income countries.
Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) and gray literature databases and trial registers will be searched for experimental studies, either randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials, comparing hernioplasty with surgical mesh versus low-cost mesh, published in any language from 2000 to the present. Two independent reviewers will conduct the literature search, screen titles and abstracts, assess full-text studies for inclusion, assess methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and extract data using a custom extraction tool. Synthesis will involve pooling for statistical meta-analysis with either a random-effects or fixed-effects model, as appropriate, and where this is not possible, findings will be presented in narrative form.
OSI Number – 20309
PMID – 31567555