Building Capacity and Infrastructure at Hospitals Implementing Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling: Experience and Lessons Learned From Nepal, Rwanda, and Tanzania

LATEST ARTICLES
SEARCH INDEX
SUGGEST ARTICLE
THE OSI COLLECTIONS
AUDIOGRAM SERIES
ABOUT THE OSI
2020 SUMMARY
2021 SUMMARY

OSI STATISTICS

Open access articles:
1358
Annotations added:
3
Countries represented:
117
No. of contributors:
13
Bookmarks made:
25

Building Capacity and Infrastructure at Hospitals Implementing Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling: Experience and Lessons Learned From Nepal, Rwanda, and Tanzania


JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Article typeJournal research article – Clinical research
Publication date – Dec – 2021
Authors – Nuwadatta Subedi, Suraj Bhattarai, Alex Mremi, Gervais Ntakirutimana, Marie Claire Ndayisaba, Belson Rugwizangoga, Djibril Mbarushimana, Elisée Hategekimana, Vestine Tuyizere, Christina Paganelli
Keywordsautopsy, cause of death, Low-and middle-income countries, minimally invasive tissue sampling, mortality surveillance
Open access – Yes
SpecialityOther
World region Central Africa, Eastern Africa, Southern Asia
Country: Nepal, Rwanda, Tanzania
Language – English
Submitted to the One Surgery Index on December 28, 2021 at 12:01 am
Abstract:

Background
Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) is a useful tool to determine cause of death in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In 2019 the MITS Surveillance Alliance supported the implementation of small-scale postmortem studies using MITS in several LMICs.

Methods
In this article we describe the preparations, challenges, and lessons learned as part of implementing MITS across 4 study sites in 3 countries: Nepal, Rwanda, and Tanzania. We describe the process for building capacity to conduct MITS, which consisted of training in MITS sample collection, individual site assessment to determine readiness and gaps prior to implementation, site visits as sites began implementation of MITS, and feedback based on remote evaluation of histology slides via an online portal.

Results
The 4 study sites each conducted 100 MITS, for a total of 400. All 4 sites lacked sufficient infrastructure and facilities to conduct MITS, and upgrades were required. Common challenges faced by sites included that clinical autopsies were neither routinely conducted nor widely accepted. Limited clinical records made cause of death determination more difficult. Lessons learned included the importance of sensitization of the community and medical staff to MITS to enhance understanding and increase consent.

Conclusions
The study sites accomplished MITS and utilized the available support systems to overcome the challenges. The quality of the procedures was satisfactory and was facilitated through the organized capacity-building programs

OSI Number – 21410

Public annotations on this article:
No public annotations yet