A country-level comparison of access to quality surgical and non-surgical healthcare from 1990-2016

LATEST ARTICLES
SEARCH INDEX
SUGGEST ARTICLE
THE OSI COLLECTIONS
AUDIOGRAM SERIES
ABOUT THE OSI

OSI STATISTICS

Total abstracts indexed:
708
Audio abstracts:
101
Open access articles:
648
Pending review:
131
Annotations added:
3
Countries represented:
94
No. of contributors:
12
Bookmarks made:
13
Specialities covered:
20

A country-level comparison of access to quality surgical and non-surgical healthcare from 1990-2016


JournalPLOS One
Article typeJournal research article – Clinical research
Publication date – Nov – 2020
Authors – Taylor Wurdeman ,Gopal Menon,John G. Meara,Blake C. Alkire
KeywordsAccess, non-surgical healthcare, surgery
Open access – Yes
SpecialityHealth policy
World region Global

Language – English
Submitted to the One Surgery Index on November 19, 2020 at 3:15 pm
Abstract:

Background: The Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) index, developed by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, uses estimates of amenable mortality to quantify health system performance over time. While much is known about general health system performance globally, few studies have portrayed the performance of surgical systems. In order to quantify access to quality surgical care, evaluate changes over time, and link these changes to health care investments, surgical and non-surgical Health Access and Quality sub-indices were developed.

Design: We categorized 32 amenable mortality causes as either surgical or non-surgical conditions. Using principal components analysis and scaled amenable mortality rates, we constructed a surgical and non-surgical Health Access and Quality sub-index. Using these sub-indices, relative improvement over time was compared. An expenditure model with country fixed effects was built to explore drivers of differences in relative improvement of sub-indices.

Results: Compared to low-income countries, high-income countries have been 2.77 times more effective at improving surgical care (p < .05). Government expenditure on healthcare has a larger effect on improving surgical Health Access and Quality (p < 0.05) while development assistance for health has a larger effect on improving non-surgical Health Access and Quality (p < 0.05).

Conclusions and relevance: Global health investment must prioritize strengthening health systems as opposed to the historically favored vertical programming. In order to achieve health equity in low-income countries, more focus should be placed on domestic financing of surgical systems. Health Access and Quality sub-indices can be used by countries to identify targets, monitor progress, and evaluate interventions aimed at improving access to quality surgical healthcare.

OSI Number – 20773
PMID – 33141856

Public annotations on this article:
No public annotations yet