A Consensus Statement for Trauma Surgery Capacity Building in Latin America

LATEST ARTICLES
SEARCH INDEX
SUGGEST ARTICLE
THE OSI COLLECTIONS
AUDIOGRAM SERIES
ABOUT THE OSI
2020 SUMMARY

OSI STATISTICS

Open access articles:
1008
Annotations added:
3
Countries represented:
109
No. of contributors:
13
Bookmarks made:
22

A Consensus Statement for Trauma Surgery Capacity Building in Latin America


JournalWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery
Article typePre-print – Clinical research
Publication date – Jan – 2021
Authors – Mohini Dasari, Erica D. Johnson, Jorge H. Montenegro, Dylan Griswold, Maria Fernanda Jiménez, Juan Carlos Puyana, Andres M. Rubiano
Keywordsacute care, consensus statements, injury surveillance, Latin America, LMICs, TBI, trauma, Trauma registry
Open access – Yes
SpecialityTrauma surgery
World region South America

Language – English
Submitted to the One Surgery Index on January 17, 2021 at 12:00 am
Abstract:

Background: Trauma is a significant public health problem in Latin America (L.A.), contributing to substantial death and disability in the region. Several LA countries have implemented trauma registries and injury surveillance systems. However, the region lacks an integrated trauma system. The consensus conference’s goal was to integrate existing L.A. trauma data collection efforts into a regional trauma program and encourage the use of the data to inform health policy.

Methods: We created a consensus group of 25 experts in trauma and emergency care with previous data collection and injury surveillance experience in the L.A. region. Experts participated in a consensus conference to discuss the state of trauma data collection in L.A. We utilized the Delphi method to build consensus around strategic steps for trauma data management in the region. Consensus was defined as the agreement of ≥ 70% among the expert panel.

Results: The consensus conference determined that action was necessary from academic bodies, scientific societies, and ministries of health to encourage a culture of collection and use of health data in trauma. The panel developed a set of recommendations for these groups to encourage the development and use of robust trauma information systems in L.A. Consensus was achieved in one Delphi round.

Conclusions: The expert group successfully reached a consensus on recommendations to key stakeholders in trauma information systems in L.A. These recommendations may be used to encourage capacity-building in trauma research and trauma health policy in the region

OSI Number – 20870

Public annotations on this article:
No public annotations yet